Export participation, completion, and comprehension data to CSV, xAPI/LRS, or via API — so Annoto's insight lives wherever your institution needs it.

Dashboards answer an instructor's daily questions, but institutions need the data itself: in their warehouse, their BI tool, their retention models. Annoto's analytics export provides two routes out of the platform, CSV downloads for hands-on analysis and an API for automated pipelines, so video engagement stops being a silo and becomes part of institutional data.
CSV export suits one-off work: an instructor pulls a course's engagement at semester end, or a program lead assembles evidence for review. The API suits recurring work, feeding scheduled pulls into a data warehouse or analytics platform. Both expose what Annoto collects across the layer, including watch behavior, quiz results, poll responses, discussion participation, and completion status, for videos hosted on Kaltura, Panopto, Wistia, YouTube, or Vimeo and courses running in Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace, or Open edX.
Institutional research teams join engagement with enrollment and outcome data to understand how video behavior relates to persistence. Program leads use exports as concrete evidence in course review and accreditation processes. Learning designers compare semesters to test whether a redesign changed how a cohort watched. Faculty running educational research get a clean, structured record of engagement instead of hand-collected screenshots.
Common builds include institution-wide dashboards in existing BI tools, early-alert feeds that flag disengaged students to advisors, and longitudinal views of how video engagement evolves across a program. Because exports can be joined with LMS records, video data lands next to grades and activity rather than in a separate report nobody opens. The API makes all of this repeatable, so reports refresh themselves instead of depending on someone remembering to download a file.
Analytics export is how the engagement layer used by institutions worldwide connects to everything else those institutions run. Field definitions, API reference, and export walkthroughs are available at docs.annoto.net.
Most teams start small: download one course's CSV, load it into the warehouse by hand, and let analysts explore the shape before committing to schema design. That first pass answers the questions that matter for pipeline work, which fields the institution actually needs, how learner and course identifiers map to existing LMS records, and what grain the reporting layer should keep. Once the model is settled, the same queries move to the API on a schedule, typically nightly, pulling by date range so each run collects only new activity instead of re-ingesting entire courses.
Export data can be read at several levels, and picking the wrong one is the most common early mistake. Aggregated per-video rows work well for executive dashboards, where the question is which courses hold attention and which lose it. Finer records suit research and early-alert use, where an advisor cares that a specific student stopped watching in week three, not that average completion dipped two points. A useful convention is to land the finest grain available in the warehouse and build rollups downstream, since aggregates can always be recomputed but detail discarded at ingestion is gone.
Engagement data describes identifiable student behavior, so it deserves the same handling as any other student record. Before a pipeline goes live, agree on who may run exports, which downstream systems may hold the data, and how long it is retained. Research projects usually work from pseudonymized extracts, with the key held by institutional research rather than the analyst. It also pays to publish a short data dictionary internally, so a completion figure means the same thing in the registrar's report as it does in a department dashboard. These decisions take one meeting and prevent months of confusion.
Book a 20-minute demo and watch analytics export work inside your LMS, on your own content.