GoReact and Bongo both let students record or upload performance video and receive time stamped feedback against a rubric, but in 2026 GoReact (now part of Echo360) is built mainly around higher education and teacher preparation, while Bongo has shifted its main website toward AI role play and partner enablement and keeps a separate higher education offering. If you are comparing them for video assignments, skills assessment and feedback, the differences sit in marker workflows, peer review controls, how each uses AI, and how much of each vendor's roadmap points at universities.
GoReact's own site carries the banner that GoReact is now part of Echo360, and the Echo360 announcement dated May 8, 2025 says GoReact is used by more than 800 academic institutions and companies. Echo360 now presents it as GoReact, Powered by Echo360 within its wider platform, and GoReact help articles have moved into the Echo360 support center.
Bongo's site lists the company as Bongo Learn, Inc., based in Loveland, Colorado, and its about page names its leadership team and board without mentioning any parent company. The Bongo homepage now leads with AI role play, AI scoring and partner readiness for companies, with higher education listed as one of its markets. The higher education product is still offered, but it is worth asking about the roadmap.
GoReact is organized around the feedback moment on a single video: time coded comments, reusable markers, rubrics and live review. Bongo is organized around assignment workflows: individual projects, timed question and answer prompts, group projects, interactive video and AI role play.
The GoReact higher education features page describes text, audio or video comments synced to moments in the video, up to 30 color coded markers for recurring feedback, and shareable rubrics or scorecards. Live Review lets an instructor or audience give feedback while a presentation is being recorded, and recordings can use multiple cameras.
Bongo's higher education page describes timestamped feedback tied to specific moments, instructor defined rubrics with criteria linked to learning objectives, and grading that can be manual or automated. Its Individual Assessment page stresses that every student is measured against the same scoring criteria and that faculty can build rubrics without technical help.
GoReact's features page says students can give and review feedback, and instructors can limit who sees videos or open feedback to the whole course. It also supports guest reviewers from outside the course, which is useful for cooperating teachers or clinical preceptors.
Bongo documents peer review in more detail. Its Peer Review Settings article covers how many reviews each student must complete, system selected or learner selected submissions, options to hide submitter or reviewer identity, and an evaluation type of five star, assignment rubric or comments only. Peer scores do not count toward the assignment grade, so they work as formative feedback.
Both vendors have added AI, with different emphasis.
GoReact lists Canvas, Blackboard, D2L Brightspace, Schoology and Moodle, plus any LTI compliant platform, and its Canvas FAQ covers how grades pass to the Canvas gradebook. Bongo lists Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, D2L Brightspace and Sakai, and its Canvas migration guide confirms the move to LTI 1.3, which requires instructors to relink existing assignments once.
On cost, GoReact publishes per user annual plans and a free 60 day trial on its pricing page. Bongo does not list higher education prices on the pages reviewed, so ask for a quote.
Annoto approaches video assignments from a different starting point. It is an interactive video layer that runs over the video host a campus already uses, such as Panopto, Kaltura, YouTube or Vimeo, or hosts video itself, inside Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace and Open edX (supported hosts).
Its video assignments let students record or upload performance video, with time stamped comments in text or video, rubric scoring on the timeline, self reflection, group critique and resubmission, and rubric totals passed to the LMS gradebook over LTI 1.3. Peer review runs as a native LMS peer review assignment, with optional anonymity where only instructors see reviewer names, and reusable assessment criteria. The same layer also handles in video quizzes, discussion and analytics on lecture video, which matters if you want one tool for both teaching video and assessed performance video.
Annoto does not match GoReact's large marker sets, multi camera live review or Bongo's AI role play. If a program only needs specialist performance assessment, either specialist tool may be enough. For a wider view of the category, see our video assignment tools guide and peer review on the timeline.
Yes. Echo360 announced the acquisition in May 2025, and GoReact's site and help center now sit under Echo360.
Yes. Bongo maintains a higher education section with individual assessment, question and answer, interactive video and AI role play, alongside its corporate products.
Bongo documents more peer review controls, such as reviewer counts and anonymity options. GoReact focuses on course wide visibility settings and guest reviewers.
GoReact lists per user annual plans on its pricing page. Bongo's higher education pages reviewed here do not list prices.
If you are weighing GoReact against a layer that also covers lecture video, our Annoto vs GoReact comparison sets out where each fits. Annoto offers a free one semester pilot with no contract, so you can test video assignments and peer review in your own LMS before deciding.
Get the best resources and research on active video learning, in your inbox, once a month.